ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Цифровая обоснованная теория×Конструктивистская обоснованная теория×
ОбластьКачественные методыКачественные методы
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления2000s–2010s (as digital data became mainstream in qualitative research)2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
Автор методаAdapted from Glaser & Strauss (1967); digital application developed through the work of Murthy (2008) and others in online qualitative researchKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
ТипQualitative research designQualitative research method
Основополагающий источникMurthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. DOI ↗Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Другие названияDGT, online grounded theory, internet-based grounded theory, grounded theory in digital contextsCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Связанные66
СводкаDigital Grounded Theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory to data gathered from digital and online environments — social media platforms, forums, blogs, comment sections, and other internet-mediated communication. Rather than simply using grounded theory on text that happens to come from digital sources, it involves adapting sampling, collection, and ethical procedures to the specific affordances and constraints of online data, while retaining the core commitment to theory generation grounded in empirical material.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Digital Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare