Сравнение методов

	Шкала поддержки демократии (Democratic Support Scale)	Шкала цинизма избирателей
Область	Политическая психология	Политическая психология
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1999	1960
Автор метода	Russell Dalton & Pippa Norris	Angus Campbell et al.
Тип	Self-report	Self-report
Основополагающий источник	Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Другие названия	SFD, Democratic Legitimacy Scale, System Support Scale	PCS, Political Efficacy Cynicism, Electoral System Cynicism
Связанные	3	3
Сводка	The Democratic Support Scale measures citizen commitment to democracy as a regime type, including beliefs that democracy is the best system of government, willingness to defend democratic institutions, and rejection of non-democratic alternatives. Pioneered by Norris (1999) and Dalton (2004) in comparative research, the measure distinguishes regime support (belief in democracy's superiority) from performance support (satisfaction with current government). It addresses the paradox of 'critical citizens'—in advanced democracies, people often express dissatisfaction with current government performance while maintaining deep commitment to democratic principles.	The Voter Cynicism Scale measures citizen skepticism and disillusionment regarding the political process, including beliefs that the electoral system is rigged, politicians are self-serving, and voting does not matter. The measure captures a pessimistic orientation toward electoral democracy distinct from distrust in institutions (which can coexist with belief in democratic potential) or political alienation. Rooted in Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960) tradition of measuring political efficacy and cynicism, the scale remains central to understanding voter turnout decline, support for populist alternatives, and democratic legitimacy crises.