Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала поддержки демократии (Democratic Support Scale)× | Шкала политического доверия× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Политическая психология | Политическая психология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1999 | 1974 |
| Автор метода≠ | Russell Dalton & Pippa Norris | Arthur H. Miller |
| Тип | Self-report | Self-report |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. link ↗ | Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | SFD, Democratic Legitimacy Scale, System Support Scale | PTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust Module |
| Связанные | 3 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | The Democratic Support Scale measures citizen commitment to democracy as a regime type, including beliefs that democracy is the best system of government, willingness to defend democratic institutions, and rejection of non-democratic alternatives. Pioneered by Norris (1999) and Dalton (2004) in comparative research, the measure distinguishes regime support (belief in democracy's superiority) from performance support (satisfaction with current government). It addresses the paradox of 'critical citizens'—in advanced democracies, people often express dissatisfaction with current government performance while maintaining deep commitment to democratic principles. | The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|