Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Модифицированный TOPSIS на основе D-чисел (теория свидетельств Денга)× | Аналитический иерархический процесс× | Метод Best-Worst× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Область | Принятие решений | Принятие решений | Принятие решений |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 2016 | 1980 | 2015 |
| Автор метода≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. |
| Тип≠ | D-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | — | — | — |
| Связанные | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Сводка≠ | D-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|
|