Сравнение методов

	Критический тематический анализ	Феминистская исследовательская методология
Область	Качественные методы	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)	1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology)
Автор метода	Draws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)	Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movement
Тип	Qualitative analysis approach	Qualitative research method
Основополагающий источник	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.	Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press.
Другие названия	CTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiry	feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical research
Связанные	5	6
Сводка	Critical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.	Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice.