Сравнение методов

	Критический герменевтический анализ	Текстология
Область	Полевые методы	Полевые методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1970s (Habermas); extended through 1980s–1990s	Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann)
Автор метода	Jürgen Habermas (critical hermeneutics); Paul Ricoeur (hermeneutics of suspicion)	Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method)
Тип	Qualitative interpretive research approach	Humanistic / philological research method
Основополагающий источник	Habermas, J. (1970). On Systematically Distorted Communication. Inquiry, 13(1–4), 205–218.	West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014
Другие названия	critical hermeneutics, critical-interpretive analysis, emancipatory hermeneutics, CHA	lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism
Связанные	5	5
Сводка	Critical hermeneutic analysis combines interpretive hermeneutics with critical social theory to read texts and discourse not only for meaning but for embedded power relations, ideological distortions, and structures of domination. Originating in Habermas's critique of Gadamer and developed further by Ricoeur's hermeneutics of suspicion, the method asks both 'what does this text mean?' and 'whose interests does this meaning serve?'. It is widely used in education, social work, policy research, and health humanities.	Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works.