ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Критический дискурс-анализ×Grounded Theory×
ОбластьКачественные методыКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появленияLate 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)1967
Автор методаNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth WodakBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
ТипQualitative research methodMethod
Основополагающий источникFairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Другие названияCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Связанные63
СводкаCritical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Critical Discourse Analysis · Grounded Theory. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare