Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала тревожности COVID-19× | Шкала усталости от пандемии× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Общественное здравоохранение | Общественное здравоохранение |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления | 2020 | 2020 |
| Автор метода≠ | Lipp et al. | Restrepo et al. |
| Тип | Self-report | Self-report |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Lipp, A., Fazio, S., & Cohen, S. (2020). COVID-19 anxiety in the United States. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1234–1248. link ↗ | Restrepo, A., Pfeil, J., & Farias, M. (2021). Pandemic fatigue and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a representative US sample. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 1093–1101. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | CAS | PFS, COVID Fatigue Scale |
| Связанные | 3 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | The COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a brief, self-administered instrument designed to assess anxiety symptoms specifically related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Developed by Lipp and colleagues in 2020, it captures worry about infection, social isolation, and pandemic-related uncertainties. The scale is widely used in epidemiological surveys and clinical research to identify individuals experiencing pandemic-related anxiety requiring intervention. | The Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) measures psychological exhaustion and reduced motivation to maintain protective behaviors during prolonged pandemics. Developed by Restrepo and colleagues, it captures the phenomenon whereby individuals progressively abandon preventive measures (distancing, mask-wearing, testing) despite ongoing transmission risk, driven by 'fatigue' or loss of motivation rather than reduced threat perception. The PFS has become essential for monitoring behavioral adherence trends and explaining divergence between risk and protective behavior during multi-wave pandemics. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|