Сравнение методов

	Corpus Concordance Analysis	Критический дискурс-анализ
Область	Лингвистика	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1991	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Автор метода	Corpus linguists (John Sinclair; Paul Baker)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Тип	Corpus-based descriptive analysis of word usage in context	Qualitative research method
Основополагающий источник	Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum. ISBN: 9780826477248	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Другие названия	Concordance Analysis, KWIC Analysis, Keyword-in-Context Analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Связанные	4	6
Сводка	Corpus concordance analysis is a core corpus-linguistic technique that retrieves every occurrence of a search word or phrase from a large body of machine-readable text and displays them in keyword-in-context (KWIC) format — the target term aligned in a central column with its surrounding co-text. By reading and sorting these lines, analysts uncover the recurrent patterns, collocations, and meanings of words as they are actually used, grounding linguistic claims in attested evidence rather than introspection.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.