ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Комплексная пропорциональная оценка×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
ОбластьПринятие решенийПринятие решений
СемействоMCDMMCDM
Год появления19961995
Автор методаZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
ТипProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Основополагающий источникZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Другие названия
Связанные88
СводкаCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: COPRAS · CRITIC. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare