Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Комплексная пропорциональная оценка× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Принятие решений | Принятие решений |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления | 1996 | 1996 |
| Автор метода≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Тип≠ | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Другие названия | — | — |
| Связанные | 8 | 8 |
| Сводка≠ | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|