ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Конструктная валидность×Дискриминантная валидность×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления19551959
Автор методаLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
ТипValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Основополагающий источникCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Другие названияconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Связанные65
СводкаConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Construct Validity · Discriminant Validity. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare