ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Пост-хок тест Коновера-Имана×Тест Данна (Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test)×
ОбластьСтатистикаСтатистика
СемействоRegression modelHypothesis test
Год появления19791964
Автор методаConover & ImanOlive Jean Dunn
ТипNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric pairwise comparison
Основополагающий источникConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Dunn, O.J. (1964). Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. DOI ↗
Другие названияConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiDunn's post-hoc test, Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc, Dunn Testi — Kruskal-Wallis Post-Hoc
Связанные35
СводкаThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.Dunn's test is a nonparametric post-hoc procedure introduced by Olive Jean Dunn in 1964 to identify which specific pairs of groups differ significantly after a Kruskal-Wallis test has returned a significant overall result. It compares groups pairwise using rank sums and applies a multiple-comparison correction — most commonly Bonferroni or Holm — to control the family-wise error rate.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Conover-Iman Test · Dunn Test. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare