Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Параллельный прагматический смешанный метод× | Прагматичный дизайн смешанных методов× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Дизайн исследования | Дизайн исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000s–2010s | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century |
| Автор метода≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark; philosophical grounding by R. Burke Johnson & Anthony Onwuegbuzie | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty |
| Тип | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Основополагающий источник | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Другие названия≠ | concurrent pragmatic design, pragmatic concurrent mixed methods, simultaneous pragmatic mixed methods | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Concurrent pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously within a pragmatic philosophical framework. Rather than privileging either positivism or constructivism, the pragmatic stance selects methods based on what best answers the research question. Both data strands are gathered in parallel, then merged at the interpretation stage to provide a fuller picture than either strand alone could yield. | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|