Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Сравнительное биографическое исследование× | Устная история× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1970s–1980s | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Автор метода≠ | Daniel Bertaux; Paul Thompson | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Bertaux, D. (Ed.). (1981). Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803914025 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Другие названия | comparative biography, cross-case biographical analysis, biographical comparative method, comparative life-story research | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Comparative biographical research is a qualitative design that gathers in-depth life-story accounts from multiple participants and systematically compares them to identify structural patterns, commonalities, and divergences across individual biographies. Rooted in the sociological life-history tradition, it moves beyond single-case description to generate broader theoretical insights about how social conditions, historical contexts, and personal agency shape individual trajectories. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|