ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Опросник общих факторов×Инвентаризация рабочей альянса×
ОбластьИсследования психотерапииИсследования психотерапии
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19921989
Автор методаMichael J. Lambert, Bruce E. WampoldAdam O. Horvath & Leslie S. Greenberg
ТипClient-ratedTherapist/Client-rated
Основополагающий источникLambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 357–361. DOI ↗Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. DOI ↗
Другие названияCFQ, Therapeutic Factors ScaleWAI, WAI-36, WAI-SF, WAI-SR
Связанные44
СводкаThe Common Factors Questionnaire (CFQ) is a structured client-report measure that quantifies the client's perception of therapeutic factors deemed common to effective psychotherapy across all modalities—including alliance, therapist empathy, client agency, goal clarity, and emotional expression. Based on Lambert's contextual model and Wampold's therapeutic relationship framework, the CFQ operationalizes the empirical finding that 70% or more of therapy outcome variance is attributable to common factors (relationship, expectancy, therapeutic environment) rather than specific technique. It is used in research to examine mechanisms of change and to compare common factors across therapy types.The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) is a validated, empirically supported measure of the therapeutic alliance—the collaborative relationship between therapist and client. Developed by Horvath and Greenberg in 1989, the WAI operationalizes Bordin's tripartite model of alliance: agreement on goals, agreement on tasks, and emotional bond. It is one of the most widely used alliance measures in psychotherapy research and is a strong predictor of psychotherapy outcome across diverse theoretical orientations and client populations.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Common Factors Questionnaire · Working Alliance Inventory. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare