Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Экспериментальный дизайн с кластерной рандомизацией и контрольной группой× | Кластерное рандомизированное контролируемое исследование× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Планирование эксперимента | Планирование эксперимента |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s (formal methodology development) | 1978–1980s |
| Автор метода≠ | Murray, D. M.; Donner, A. and Klar, N. (systematic formalization) | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| Тип | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| Основополагающий источник | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340691533 | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| Другие названия | CRCT with control group, group-randomized trial, cluster RCT control group design, community randomized controlled trial | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | A cluster randomized control group experimental design randomly assigns intact groups (clusters) — such as schools, clinics, or communities — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions. At least one cluster group receives no active intervention, serving as the control. This design is essential when individual randomization is impractical or contamination between participants in close proximity is likely. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|