Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ судебной практики× | Дискурс-анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Полевые методы | Качественные исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | Medieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th century | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор метода≠ | Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative legal research method | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455227689 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | judicial decision analysis, legal case analysis, jurisprudential analysis, case-based legal research | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Сводка≠ | Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it from obiter dicta, and trace how that reasoning has been applied, distinguished, or overruled across subsequent cases. The method is fundamental to legal scholarship, litigation strategy, and law reform research. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|