ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Анализ сравнения методов Блэнда-Альтмана×Коэффициент каппа Коэна×
ОбластьСтатистикаСтатистика
СемействоHypothesis testHypothesis test
Год появления19861960
Автор методаJ. Martin Bland & Douglas G. AltmanJacob Cohen
ТипGraphical and statistical method comparisonInter-rater reliability coefficient
Основополагающий источникBland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗
Другие названияBland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizikappa coefficient, kappa statistic, Cohen's Kappa (Değerlendiriciler Arası Uyum)
Связанные53
СводкаThe Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population.Cohen's kappa (κ) is a statistical measure of inter-rater reliability for categorical classifications, introduced by Jacob Cohen in 1960. Unlike simple percent agreement, kappa corrects for the level of agreement that would be expected purely by chance, making it the standard metric when two raters independently assign observations to the same set of mutually exclusive categories.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Bland-Altman Analysis · Cohen's Kappa. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare