ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Обзор с использованием библиометрического картирования×Обзор области применения (Scoping Review)×
ОбластьНаукометрияНаукометрия
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления2017 (bibliometrix tool); mapping review approach formalised c. 2010s2005
Автор методаAria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix, 2017); mapping review methodology developed in evidence synthesis community (~2000s)Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
ТипTool-assisted evidence mapping reviewEvidence synthesis review design
Основополагающий источникAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
Другие названияbibliometrix mapping review, R-bibliometrix evidence map, bibliometric-assisted systematic map, bibliometrix evidence synthesis mapscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Связанные56
СводкаA bibliometrix-assisted mapping review combines the structured scope-and-search logic of an evidence mapping review with the analytical power of the bibliometrix R package. Instead of manually categorising studies, the researcher leverages bibliometrix functions — keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic clustering, and yearly trend analysis — to chart the landscape of a research field systematically and at scale, producing an interactive, reproducible evidence map.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: bibliometrix-assisted mapping review · Scoping Review. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare