ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Геомеханика методом граничных элементов×Конечный метод полос (FSM)×
ОбластьГражданское строительствоГражданское строительство
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19781976
Автор методаCarlos Alberto BrebbiaY. K. Cheung
ТипMesh-less numerical method for geomechanical problemsReduced-dimension numerical method for prismatic structures
Основополагающий источникBrebbia, C. A. (1978). The Boundary Element Method for Engineers. Pentech Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5Cheung, Y. K. (1976). Finite Strip Method in Structural Analysis. Pergamon Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5
Другие названияBoundary element method, BEM analysis, Indirect methodsFSM, Strip method, Semi-analytical finite element
Связанные33
СводкаThe boundary element method (BEM) for geomechanics is a numerical approach that solves problems by discretizing only the boundary of the domain, using analytical solutions for the interior. Introduced by Brebbia in 1978 and refined for geotechnical applications by Crouch and Starfield, BEM is particularly effective for infinite or semi-infinite domains (underground excavations, foundations, rock masses) where finite element methods are impractical.The finite strip method (FSM) is a semi-analytical numerical approach for analyzing prismatic or cylindrical structures by dividing them into strips in one direction and using analytical or exact solutions in the perpendicular direction. Developed by Cheung in 1976, FSM reduces computational cost and often provides superior accuracy for structures with regular geometry along one axis.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: BEM Geomechanics · Finite Strip Method. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare