Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Отчет Бельмонта× | Принципы добросовестности исследований× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Этика исследований | Этика исследований |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1979 | 2007 |
| Автор метода≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US DHEW) | Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards) |
| Тип | Framework | Framework |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. link ↗ | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Belmont Principles, Three Ethical Principles | Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The Belmont Report (1979) is the foundational US ethical framework for human subjects research, established by the National Commission following the Tuskegee Syphilis Study scandal. It articulates three core principles—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—that form the basis for institutional review and regulatory oversight of human research globally. Every researcher conducting human studies must understand and apply these principles. | Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|