ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Байесовский экс пост факто дизайн×Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности×
ОбластьДизайн исследованияСтатистика исследований
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1964 (Kerlinger ex post facto); Bayesian integration from 1990s–2000s onward1983
Автор методаFrederick N. Kerlinger (ex post facto framework); Bayesian extension draws on Laplace and modern Bayesian statisticsPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипQuantitative observational research design with Bayesian inferenceMethod
Основополагающий источникKerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Другие названияBayesian causal-comparative design, Bayesian after-the-fact design, Bayesian observational causal design, Bayesian retrospective causal studyPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Связанные53
СводкаBayesian ex post facto design investigates possible causal relationships among variables that have already occurred, without researcher manipulation of those variables, and quantifies uncertainty about those relationships using Bayesian statistical inference. The researcher selects groups that differ on an outcome or a presumed cause after the fact, then uses prior knowledge and observed data together — via Bayes' theorem — to estimate credible effect sizes, group differences, or predictors.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Bayesian Ex Post Facto Design · Propensity Score Matching. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare