ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Обнаружение архитектурных запахов×Модель прогнозирования дефектов×
ОбластьПрограммная инженерияПрограммная инженерия
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления20092005
Автор методаMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Типpattern-based analysismachine learning model
Основополагающий источникFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Другие названияdesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Связанные44
СводкаArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare