Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Аналитический иерархический процесс× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Принятие решений | Принятие решений |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 1980 | 1995 |
| Автор метода≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Тип≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | — | — |
| Связанные | 8 | 8 |
| Сводка≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|