Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Аналитический иерархический процесс× | Метод Best-Worst× | Теория многокритериальной полезности× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Область | Принятие решений | Принятие решений | Принятие решений |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 1980 | 2015 | 1976 |
| Автор метода≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. |
| Тип≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Additive multi-attribute utility function |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4 |
| Другие названия | — | — | — |
| Связанные | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Сводка≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|
|