Сравнение методов

	Аналитический иерархический процесс	Метод Best-Worst	Комплексная пропорциональная оценка
Область	Принятие решений	Принятие решений	Принятие решений
Семейство	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Год появления	1980	2015	1996
Автор метода	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
Тип	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Основополагающий источник	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
Другие названия	—	—	—
Связанные	8	8	8
Сводка	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.