Form Criticism
Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
- Gunkel, H. (1987). The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History (trans. W. H. Carruth). New York: Schocken Books. [German original 1901]. ISBN: 9780805200867
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/religious-studies/form-criticism
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ porównaj
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ porównaj
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ porównaj
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ porównaj
Cytowana przez
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →