Conspectus Collection Assessment
Conspectus collection assessment is a structured method for describing and evaluating a library collection subject by subject using a standardized framework of collecting levels. Developed by the Research Libraries Group (RLG) and elaborated by the Western Library Network (WLN), the conspectus partitions the universe of knowledge into subject divisions aligned with Library of Congress or Dewey classification and rates each on a 0-to-5 scale that runs from out-of-scope to comprehensive. Crucially, it separates the existing strength of what a library already holds from its current collecting intensity and its collection goal, producing a profile that supports cooperative collection development and comparison across institutions. Howard D. White's Brief Tests of Collection Strength (1995) gave the method an objective verification layer, using graded checklists to corroborate the otherwise judgmental level assignments.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- White, H. D. (1995). Brief Tests of Collection Strength: A Methodology for All Types of Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN: 9780313294624
- Bibliotheca Alexandrina / IFLA Section on Acquisition and Collection Development (2001). Guidelines for a Collection Development Policy Using the Conspectus Model. The Hague: IFLA. link ↗
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Conspectus Collection Assessment (RLG/WLN Collecting-Level Evaluation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/library-information-science/conspectus-collection-assessment
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Citation Analysis for Collection DevelopmentLibrary Information Science↔ porównaj
- Collection Overlap AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ porównaj
Cytowana przez
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →