ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Statystyka J Youdena×Zrównoważona dokładność×Wynik F1×Specyficzność×
DziedzinaOcena modeliOcena modeliOcena modeliOcena modeli
RodzinaMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Rok powstania19502010197920th century
TwórcaW. J. YoudenBrodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannC. J. van RijsbergenHistorical statistical foundations
TypEvaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
Źródło pierwotneYouden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32-35. DOI ↗Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyYouden Index, Sensitivity + Specificity - 1Average Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityF-measure, Harmonic MeanTrue Negative Rate, TNR
Pokrewne3555
PodsumowanieYoudens J statistic, also called the Youden index, measures the maximum difference between the true positive rate and false positive rate across different classification thresholds. It is useful for selecting optimal cutoff points in diagnostic testing.Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.Specificity measures the proportion of actual negative cases that were correctly identified as negative by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly negative, how many did we correctly reject?' Specificity is complementary to recall and is essential when false positives are costly.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Youdens J Statistic · Balanced Accuracy · F1-Score · Specificity. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare