ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Wild Card Analysis×Emerging Issues Analysis×
DziedzinaFutures Foresight StudiesFutures Foresight Studies
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20092009
TwórcaFutures studies surprise-analysis tradition (Millennium Project / Futures Research Methodology); foresight process framing by Joseph VorosGraham T. T. Molitor; Hawai'i School / Millennium Project
TypSurprise-assessment pipeline for low-probability, high-impact eventsEarly-detection pipeline for issues on the S-curve of public attention
Źródło pierwotneGlenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Futures Research Methodology, Version 3.0. The Millennium Project. ISBN: 9780981894119Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Futures Research Methodology, Version 3.0. The Millennium Project. ISBN: 9780981894119
Inne nazwyWild Cards, Wildcard Analysis, High-Impact Low-Probability Event Analysis, Surprise Event AnalysisEmerging Issue Analysis, EIA, Issues Emergence Analysis, Weak Signal Scanning
Pokrewne43
PodsumowanieWild card analysis is a futures method for confronting low-probability, high-impact surprise events — the abrupt discontinuities that conventional planning, anchored on expected trends, tends to ignore precisely because they are unlikely. The discipline of the method is to take such events seriously without succumbing to alarmism: to generate a deliberate set of plausible wild cards, assess each for its likelihood and the severity of its consequences, estimate how much warning the organization would have, and gauge its vulnerability. The payoff is not a prediction but robustness — strategies, capabilities, and contingency plans that hold up across a range of shocks rather than only in the expected future. As codified in the Millennium Project's Futures Research Methodology and located within Joseph Voros's generic foresight process, wild card analysis complements trend-based foresight by deliberately stress-testing the organization against the rare events that, by their very impact, can dominate its fate.Emerging Issues Analysis (EIA) is a horizon-scanning method, associated with Graham Molitor and the Hawai'i School and codified in the Millennium Project's Futures Research Methodology, for detecting issues at the earliest, weakest-signal stage — long before they register as trends or reach public consciousness. Its organizing idea is that issues, like technologies, follow an S-curve of public attention: they begin in obscure, marginal sources, accelerate as advocates and specialists pick them up, and only later become widely recognized trends and finally mainstream concerns. The strategic value of catching an issue on the flat, early part of that curve is enormous, because that is when there is the most time and the most room to respond. EIA therefore deliberately scans the fringe — specialist literature, activist publications, patents, subcultures, marginal voices — to spot the small clouds on the horizon and position them on the issue lifecycle.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Wild Card Analysis · Emerging Issues Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare