Porównaj metody

	Vertical Scaling	Teoria odpowiedzi na pozycje (IRT)
Dziedzina	Education	Psychometria
Rodzina	Latent structure	Latent structure
Rok powstania	2014	1952–1968
Twórca	Educational measurement tradition (Thurstone; Kolen & Brennan synthesis)	Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
Typ	Construction of a single developmental score scale spanning multiple grades	Probabilistic measurement model
Źródło pierwotne	Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 9781493903160	Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley.
Inne nazwy	Developmental Scaling, Vertical Linking, Cross-Grade Scaling, Growth Scale Construction	IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
Pokrewne	4	5
Podsumowanie	Vertical scaling places tests written for different grade levels onto a single continuous score scale so that growth from one grade to the next can be measured in common units. Unlike horizontal equating, which links alternate forms intended to be interchangeable, vertical scaling deliberately links tests of differing difficulty and content to build a developmental continuum spanning, for example, grades 3 through 8. It is the measurement foundation that lets a fourth-grade and a fifth-grade score be subtracted to express how much a student grew.	Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.