ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

UTA*×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
DziedzinaPodejmowanie decyzjiPodejmowanie decyzji
RodzinaMCDMMCDM
Rok powstania19851995
TwórcaSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Źródło pierwotneSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Inne nazwy
Pokrewne88
PodsumowanieUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: UTASTAR · CRITIC. Pobrano 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare