ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Meta-analiza czasowa×Przegląd literatury systematyczny×
DziedzinaNaukometriaNaukometria
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1992 (cumulative form); refined through 2000s1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
TwórcaLau et al. (cumulative variant); Borenstein et al. (general meta-analytic framework)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
TypQuantitative evidence synthesis variantEvidence synthesis methodology
Źródło pierwotneBorenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470057247Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
Inne nazwytemporal meta-analysis, period-stratified meta-analysis, time-segmented meta-analysis, chronological meta-analysisSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
Pokrewne55
PodsumowanieTime-sliced meta-analysis is a variant of standard meta-analysis in which the primary studies are partitioned into successive time periods (slices) and a separate pooled effect estimate is computed for each period. By comparing pooled effects across periods, researchers can detect whether an intervention's effectiveness, a relationship's magnitude, or a methodological consensus has shifted over time. This temporal lens transforms a static evidence summary into a longitudinal narrative of how scientific knowledge on a topic has evolved.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Time-sliced Meta-analysis · Systematic Literature Review. Pobrano 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare