Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Survey Experiment× | Conjoint Survey Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Political Science | Political Science |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2011 | 2014 |
| Twórca≠ | Experimental political science; synthesized by Diana Mutz | Jens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto |
| Typ≠ | Randomized experiment embedded in a survey | Multi-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimands |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691144528 | Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | Population-based survey experiment, Survey-embedded experiment, Question-wording experiment, Framing experiment | Causal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experiment |
| Pokrewne | 4 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | A survey experiment embeds a randomized experiment inside a survey: respondents are randomly assigned to different versions of a question, frame, or stimulus, and their answers are compared to estimate a causal effect. By combining the internal validity of randomization with the representative samples and rich measurement of survey research, survey experiments — especially population-based ones — let political scientists draw causal inferences about how information, framing, or message attributes shape public attitudes and behavior. | A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|