ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Spradley Domain Analysis×Cultural Domain Analysis×Folk Taxonomy Analysis×
DziedzinaAnthropologyAnthropologyAnthropology
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania197919941979
TwórcaJames P. SpradleyStephen P. Borgatti (synthesis of cognitive anthropology methods)Ethnoscience / cognitive anthropology (systematized by Spradley)
TypInterpretive procedure for discovering folk semantic domainsIntegrated framework for eliciting and analyzing cultural domainsProcedure for reconstructing hierarchical folk classifications
Źródło pierwotneSpradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968Borgatti, S. P. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(4), 261–278. link ↗Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968
Inne nazwyDevelopmental Research Sequence, DRS Domain Analysis, Ethnographic Domain Analysis, Semantic Domain AnalysisCDA, Domain Analysis (cognitive anthropology), Cultural Domains Approach, Cognitive Domain AnalysisTaxonomic Analysis, Folk Classification Analysis, Folk Taxonomies, Ethnotaxonomy
Pokrewne343
PodsumowanieSpradley's domain analysis is the first analytic step in James Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence for ethnography. It systematically searches interview and observation data for cultural domains — categories of meaning organized around a cover term and the more specific terms it includes — by looking for the semantic relationships, such as 'is a kind of' or 'is a way to,' that informants use to connect them. The goal is to discover how members of a culture organize their knowledge in their own words.Cultural domain analysis is the integrated framework in cognitive anthropology for discovering the content and structure of a cultural domain — a coherent set of related items such as illnesses, animals, kin terms, or emotions — as the members of a culture themselves organize it. It chains together elicitation methods (free listing, pile sorting, triad tests) and analytic methods (salience, multidimensional scaling, clustering, consensus analysis) to move from 'what items are in this domain?' to 'how are they organized and how widely is that organization shared?'Folk taxonomy analysis — taxonomic analysis in Spradley's terms — reconstructs how a culture hierarchically classifies the items of a domain through the inclusion relationship 'is a kind of.' It takes the terms surfaced in domain analysis and arranges them into nested levels, revealing the folk classification system: which broad categories contain which narrower ones, and how deep the hierarchy goes. The result is the culture's own taxonomy, which may differ markedly from any scientific one.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Spradley Domain Analysis · Cultural Domain Analysis · Folk Taxonomy Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-25 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare