Porównaj metody

	SES Framework	CPR Design-Principle Diagnostics
Dziedzina	Environmental Sociology	Environmental Sociology
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	2009	1990
Twórca	Elinor Ostrom	Elinor Ostrom; reviewed and refined by Michael Cox, Gwen Arnold & Sergio Villamayor-Tomas
Typ	Multi-tier diagnostic framework for sustainability of coupled human-natural systems	Diagnostic checklist for robustness of common-pool resource institutions
Źródło pierwotne	Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422.	Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521405997
Inne nazwy	Social-Ecological Systems Framework, Ostrom SES Framework, Coupled Human-Natural Systems Framework, Multi-Tier SES Diagnostic Framework	Design Principles Diagnostics, Commons Design Principles Analysis, Ostrom Design Principles, Robust CPR Institution Diagnostics
Pokrewne	3	3
Podsumowanie	The social-ecological systems (SES) framework, set out by Elinor Ostrom in her 2009 Science paper, is a multi-tier diagnostic structure for analyzing why some coupled human-natural systems are governed sustainably and others are not. It treats a social-ecological system as the interplay of four core subsystems, a resource system, the resource units it produces, a governance system, and the users, all embedded in broader social, economic, and political settings and related ecosystems. Each core subsystem unpacks into second- and lower-tier variables, giving a shared, nested vocabulary of dozens of attributes that can be drawn on selectively for a given question. The framework extends Ostrom's earlier Institutional Analysis and Development work to tightly coupled human-environment systems and is designed to support cumulative, comparable diagnosis of sustainability, including the conditions under which users self-organize to manage a resource.	Common-pool resource (CPR) diagnostics evaluate a self-governing commons against the design principles that Elinor Ostrom, in Governing the Commons (1990), found to characterize long-enduring institutions for managing shared resources. A common-pool resource is one from which it is hard to exclude users but where one person's use subtracts from what is left for others, creating dilemmas of overuse and underprovision. Ostrom's comparison of irrigation systems, fisheries, forests, and grazing commons that had survived for generations against those that had collapsed yielded eight design principles, from clearly defined boundaries and rules matched to local conditions, through collective-choice arrangements, monitoring, graduated sanctions, and conflict resolution, to recognized rights to organize and nested enterprises. A later systematic review by Cox, Arnold, and Villamayor-Tomas confirmed and refined these principles. The method uses them as a diagnostic checklist to assess and explain the robustness of commons institutions.