ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Badania przyczynowo-porównawcze wspomagane symulacją×Dopasowanie wyników skłonności×
DziedzinaProjektowanie badańStatystyka w badaniach
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstaniaLate 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s)1983
TwórcaSynthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypHybrid observational-simulation designMethod
Źródło pierwotneFraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwysimulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Pokrewne43
PodsumowanieSimulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research · Propensity Score Matching. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare