ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Ważność treści skróconej wersji skali×Wiarygodność dyskryminacyjna×
DziedzinaPsychometriaPsychometria
RodzinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok powstania1995–20001959
TwórcaMessick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TypValidity evaluationValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Źródło pierwotneSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyabbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Pokrewne65
PodsumowanieShort-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Short form content validity · Discriminant Validity. Pobrano 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare