ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Roll-Call Analysis×Wordfish Scaling×
DziedzinaPolitical SciencePolitical Science
RodzinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok powstania2008
TwórcaSpatial-voting tradition; Poole, Rosenthal, Clinton, Jackman, RiversJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver Proksch
TypScaling and analysis of legislative binary-choice dataUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count data
Źródło pierwotnePoole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237. link ↗Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyRoll call voting analysis, Legislative vote scaling, Roll-call scaling, Optimal classification of votesWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimation
Pokrewne34
PodsumowanieRoll-call analysis is the study of recorded legislative votes to recover the structure of political conflict — the ideological positions of legislators, the dimensionality of the issue space, and the cohesion of parties. It encompasses parametric spatial and item-response models that estimate latent ideal points, nonparametric scaling such as optimal classification that maximizes correctly classified votes without distributional assumptions, and descriptive cohesion statistics like the Rice index. Together these tools turn a matrix of yea/nay votes into a map of who agrees with whom and why.Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Roll-Call Analysis · Wordfish Scaling. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare