Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Robust Model Testing Research× | Badanie testujące model× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Projektowanie badań | Projektowanie badań |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1988–1998 | 1970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s |
| Twórca≠ | Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai Yuan | Karl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition |
| Typ≠ | Quantitative model-testing research design with robust estimation | Confirmatory quantitative research design |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344 |
| Inne nazwy | robust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation research | model-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR |
| Pokrewne≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Robust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached. | Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|