Porównaj metody

	Ryzyko-zorientowana Metodologia Powierzchni Odpowiedzi	Solidna Metodologia Powierzchni Odpowiedzi
Dziedzina	Planowanie eksperymentów	Planowanie eksperymentów
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1990s–2000s (risk-based extensions)	1990
Twórca	Builds on Box & Wilson (1951) RSM; risk integration formalized in engineering reliability literature from the 1990s onward	G. G. Vining and Raymond H. Myers (dual response formulation)
Typ	Experimental optimization with probabilistic risk constraints	Experimental optimization technique
Źródło pierwotne	Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470174463	Vining, G. G., & Myers, R. H. (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22(1), 38–45.
Inne nazwy	Risk-based RSM, reliability-based RSM, probabilistic RSM, risk-integrated response surface methodology	Robust RSM, dual response surface methodology, robust parameter design via RSM, mean-variance RSM
Pokrewne	5	3
Podsumowanie	Risk-based Response Surface Methodology (Risk-based RSM) extends classical RSM by embedding probabilistic risk or reliability constraints into the experimental optimization process. Rather than seeking a single optimal point under deterministic conditions, it identifies factor settings that achieve performance goals while keeping the probability of failure or unacceptable outcomes below a specified threshold — making it especially valuable in safety-critical and high-variability engineering contexts.	Robust Response Surface Methodology (Robust RSM) is an experimental optimization strategy that simultaneously fits two regression models — one for the mean response and one for its variance (or standard deviation) — across a designed experiment. By jointly optimizing these dual surfaces, engineers identify factor settings that hit a performance target while minimizing process variability, combining the empirical model-building power of classical RSM with the variance-reduction goals of robust parameter design.