Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Racial Resentment Scale× | Blatant Dehumanization Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Psychologia polityczna | Psychologia polityczna |
| Rodzina | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1996 | 2015 |
| Twórca≠ | Donald R. Kinder & Lynn M. Sanders | Nour Kteily, Emile Bruneau, Adam Waytz & Sarah Cotterill |
| Typ≠ | Attitude scale for racialized policy opinion | Graphic-slider measure of dehumanization |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226435749 | Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The Ascent of Man: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence for Blatant Dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901-931. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | Racial Resentment Battery, Kinder-Sanders Racial Resentment Measure, New Racism Scale, Racial Resentment Index | Ascent of Man Scale, Ascent Dehumanization Measure, Kteily-Bruneau Dehumanization Scale, Blatant Animalistic Dehumanization Measure |
| Pokrewne | 3 | 3 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The Racial Resentment Scale, developed by Donald Kinder and Lynn Sanders in Divided by Color (1996), measures a modern, symbolic form of racial prejudice in which anti-Black affect is fused with the traditional American value of individualism. Rather than endorsing biological inferiority, racially resentful respondents express the belief that Black Americans violate norms of self-reliance and hard work and make illegitimate demands for special treatment. The standard battery of four agree-disagree items has become the dominant survey measure of racial attitudes in American political science and a powerful predictor of opinion on welfare, affirmative action, and racialized candidate evaluation. | The Blatant Dehumanization Scale, also called the Ascent of Man measure, captures the willingness to overtly deny full humanity to an out-group. Developed by Nour Kteily, Emile Bruneau, Adam Waytz, and Sarah Cotterill in 2015, it uses the iconic evolutionary image of a creature progressing from ape to upright human and asks respondents to rate, on a slider from zero to one hundred, how evolved different social groups are. The gap between how human respondents rate their own group and how human they rate an out-group is a strikingly direct, robust predictor of hostility, support for coercive policies, and aggression that goes beyond ordinary dislike. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|