Porównaj metody

	Analiza współcytowań zgodna z PRISMA	Analiza bibliometryczna
Dziedzina	Naukometria	Naukometria
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Twórca	PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Typ	Systematic bibliometric review	Quantitative literature analysis
Źródło pierwotne	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Inne nazwy	systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Pokrewne	6	6
Podsumowanie	PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.