Porównaj metody

	Plagiat przez parafrazę	Plagiat mozaikowy
Dziedzina	Etyka badań naukowych	Etyka badań naukowych
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1980s	1990s
Twórca	Academic integrity framework (modern definition)	Academic integrity framework (modern definition)
Typ	Concept	Concept
Źródło pierwotne	Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity.	Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity.
Inne nazwy	insufficient paraphrase, close paraphrase, lazy paraphrasing	patch-writing, patchwork plagiarism, incremental plagiarism
Pokrewne	4	4
Podsumowanie	Paraphrasing plagiarism occurs when an author rewrites another's ideas in different words but does not cite the source. Unlike verbatim plagiarism (copying word-for-word), paraphrasing plagiarism involves changing vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original argument, logic, or conceptual content without attribution. It is harder to detect than direct copying but is still a clear violation of academic integrity.	Mosaic plagiarism, also called patch-writing, occurs when an author mixes copied phrases and sentences from a source with original text, rearranges material from multiple sources, or interweaves paraphrased and verbatim passages without proper citation or quotation marks. It is difficult to detect because the copied portions are interspersed with original writing, creating a surface appearance of original work.