Porównaj metody

	Wielosprawowa analiza konwersacji oparta na przypadkach	Krytyczna analiza dyskursu
Dziedzina	Metody jakościowe	Metody jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Twórca	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert Yin	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Qualitative multi-case analytic design	Qualitative research method
Źródło pierwotne	Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Inne nazwy	multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CA	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Pokrewne	5	6
Podsumowanie	Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.