ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Notatki terenowe z wielu źródeł×Gromadzenie dokumentów z wielu źródeł×
DziedzinaMetodologia badań sondażowychMetodologia badań sondażowych
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1970s–1990s (multi-observer extensions formalised in mixed-methods era)1970s–2000s (systematic articulation)
TwórcaEthnographic research tradition; systematised by Emerson, Fretz & ShawRooted in qualitative documentary traditions; codified in mixed-methods and triangulation literature (Denzin 1970s; Bowen 2009)
TypQualitative data collection techniqueData collection strategy
Źródło pierwotneEmerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206837Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗
Inne nazwymulti-observer field notes, triangulated field notes, collaborative field notes, multi-site field notesmulti-source documentary research, multiple-document data collection, multi-site document analysis, cross-source document gathering
Pokrewne63
PodsumowanieMulti-source field notes is a data collection approach in which two or more observers, sites, or vantage points contribute written records of naturally occurring events, interactions, and settings. By pooling notes from multiple sources, researchers cross-check individual impressions and capture aspects of a scene that any single observer would miss, strengthening descriptive richness and analytical trustworthiness.Multi-source document collection is a data-gathering strategy in which researchers systematically locate, retrieve, and compare documents drawn from two or more independent sources — such as government archives, institutional records, media outlets, organisational reports, or digital repositories. By assembling evidence from diverse provenance, researchers can triangulate findings, detect discrepancies, and build a richer, more credible picture of the phenomenon under study than any single documentary source can provide.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Download slides

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Multi-source Field Notes · Multi-source Document Collection. Pobrano 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare