Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| MMAT× | Lista kontrolna CASP dla badań randomizowanych z grupą kontrolną× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Metodologia badań | Metodologia badań |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2014 (updated 2018) | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| Twórca≠ | Pluye et al. | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| Typ≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | MMAT, MMAT 2018 | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| Pokrewne | 4 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) is a practical, design-agnostic quality assessment tool developed by Pluye et al. (2014, updated 2018) to evaluate the methodological quality of quantitative (RCTs, non-randomized studies), qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Unlike tools designed for single paradigms (e.g., Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs), MMAT provides unified criteria applicable across diverse research methodologies, making it particularly useful for systematic reviews incorporating multiple study designs. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|