ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza Metafory Longitudinalnej×Analiza tematyczna×
DziedzinaMetody jakościoweBadania jakościowe
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania2000s–2010s (systematic longitudinal application)2006
TwórcaLynne Cameron and colleagues (discourse dynamics framework); broader tradition rooted in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory (1980)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative analytic methodMethod
Źródło pierwotneCameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox. ISBN: 978-1845531140Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyLMA, diachronic metaphor analysis, longitudinal conceptual metaphor study, repeated-measures metaphor analysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Pokrewne53
PodsumowanieLongitudinal Metaphor Analysis (LMA) is a qualitative method that tracks how individuals or groups use metaphors across multiple time points to reveal conceptual, attitudinal, or identity shifts. Grounded in conceptual metaphor theory and discourse dynamics, it treats metaphor not as mere rhetorical decoration but as a window into evolving thought, belief, and meaning-making over time.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Longitudinal Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare