ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Logic Model×Evidence-Based Practice Process×
DziedzinaSocial WorkSocial Work
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20041996
TwórcaProgram-evaluation tradition; popularized by the W. K. Kellogg FoundationEvidence-based medicine tradition (Sackett et al.); translated to social work by Gambrill and others
TypDiagram linking program resources and activities to intended outcomesStructured process for integrating evidence, expertise, and client values in practice decisions
Źródło pierwotneW. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. link ↗Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyProgram Logic Model, Logical Framework, Program Theory Model, Logic Model (Social Work)EBP Process, Evidence-Based Practice (Process Model), Five-Step EBP Process, Evidence-Informed Practice Process
Pokrewne44
PodsumowanieA logic model is a diagram that lays out the intended logic of a program — how its resources and activities are expected to produce outputs and, through them, short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes. Popularized in human services by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's development guide, it makes a program's underlying theory of change explicit and testable, providing the backbone for program planning, communication with stakeholders, and evaluation by clarifying exactly what the program does and what it is supposed to achieve.The evidence-based practice (EBP) process is a structured, five-step way of making practice decisions by integrating the best available research evidence with professional expertise and the client's values and circumstances. Originating in evidence-based medicine as defined by Sackett and colleagues and translated into social work by Eileen Gambrill and others, it reframes EBP not as a fixed list of approved programs but as a transparent decision process — ask, acquire, appraise, apply, assess — that an individual practitioner carries out with and for a particular client.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Logic Model · Evidence-Based Practice Process. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare